91É«Ç鯬

Letter: What's in a name? For fields, quite a lot

Published 24 June 2026

From Harold Kirkham, Richland, Washington, US

The article about fields reminded me of my undergraduate days. When Chanda Prescod-Weinstein writes that a field is a mathematical relation that “assigns a number to each point in space and time”, she is, of course, correct. Novice electrical engineers were expected to accept this as a matter of faith, something I found challenging (23 May, p 17).

Ultimately, the problem is that we use the word “field” to mean the abstract, conceptual-world representation of something to which we also give the name “field.” A description in the conceptual world cannot influence the path of a particle, and cannot be measured. But an electric or magnetic field can most certainly change the motion of a particle, and can be measured.

As a metrologist, I would say that a “field” is something that exists in space and time, and affects things in the real world. It is unfortunate that we use the same word to name its mathematical model in the conceptual world.

Issue no. 3601 published 27 June 2026

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop