A GROWING number of supermarkets and restaurants proudly declare that the fish they sell is “sustainable” or “responsibly sourced”. This is a welcome sign that consumers are exercising their marketplace muscle to stop threatened species ending up on their plates. The trouble is that no consensus exists over what these labels mean – making it hard for consumers to distinguish genuine conservation efforts from dubious practices that hide behind ambiguous phraseology (see “Beware of ‘bluewash’: Which fish should you buy?”). The issue of declining fish stocks is too important to allow these initiatives to be undermined by specious or exaggerated…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
If you aren't terrified by this heatwave, you should be
2
Woman with Alzheimer's starts conversing again after taking psilocybin
3
The race to understand how and when Thwaites glacier will collapse
4
Lost books by ancient philosophers recovered from 'unreadable' scrolls
5
The surprising ways your brain changes from your 20s to your 40s
6
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
7
The best sci-fi novel in 2026 so far – plus 6 other great reads
8
How menopause radically changes the brain – and what happens after
9
Unapproved gene therapy for boosting longevity is set to go on sale
10
Phages could enable us to hijack vaccine immunity to kill cancer cells



