On your waiting-to-read shelf? “I rarely read books not connected with my research or my own writing.” This is not restrictive, he says, “since both my research and writing span broad areas, and the books pile grows faster than I can deplete it”. He even wrote about The Da Vinci Code (Bantam, 2003). How was it? “Michael Brown can tell a good story in a formulaic fashion,” he says. “But I found his terse, breathless style annoying, and persevered because I had agreed to write about it.” Devlin reckons Brown got about half of the maths wrong, “almost certainly because he used popular sources…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
If you aren't terrified by this heatwave, you should be
3
Ancient human DNA found on cave art for the first time
4
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
5
We鈥檝e uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
6
You should turn off fans when it's too hot 鈥 but how hot is too hot?
7
How menopause radically changes the brain 鈥 and what happens after
8
The best sci-fi novel in 2026 so far 鈥 plus 6 other great reads
9
How some people's brains make an extraordinary recovery from stroke
10
The 17 best popular science books of 2026 so far



