Doctors and patients are being misled by the results of drug trials published in major international medical journals. According to a new analysis, reports on trials designed to find out how well a drug prevents strokes or heart attack, for example, include only the most flattering statistics, which makes a drug or procedure seem more effective than it actually is. Of 359 articles published between 1989 and 1998 in five major journals, all included a relative measure of how the drug reduces health risks, say Jim Nuovo and Joy Melnikow at the University of California, Davis. But only eight reported…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
Remote-controlled cockroach swarm can now breathe underwater
3
If you aren't terrified by this heatwave, you should be
4
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
5
We鈥檝e uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
6
Ancient human DNA found on cave art for the first time
7
You should turn off fans when it's too hot 鈥 but how hot is too hot?
8
Neuroscience can't tell us the way to govern people's brains
9
Screwworm could be the first species targeted by an 'extinction drive'
10
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time



