STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
3
Remote-controlled cockroach swarm can now breathe underwater
4
The race to understand how and when Thwaites glacier will collapse
5
Humans sleep the least of all apes – is it the secret to our success?
6
US government wants to have a useful quantum computer by 2028
7
We’ve uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
8
The best sci-fi novel in 2026 so far – plus 6 other great reads
9
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
10
Childbirth for many primate species is even harder than for humans



