Eight-year-old kids can identify Pokémon “species” from the card-trading game more easily than they can name their local wildlife. Zoologist Andrew Balmford and his colleagues at Cambridge University showed more than 100 children pictures of Pokémon characters and common British species, such as badgers and oak trees. Children aged 8 could name 80 per cent of Pokémon characters, but they could identify only half the plants and animals (Science, vol 295, p 2367). Unless kids get more clued up about nature, says team member Tim Coulson, they won’t be enthusiastic about conservation as adults. “Maybe an animal version of Pokémon could help,” he says.…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Technology
US government wants to have a useful quantum computer by 2028
News

Life
Childbirth for many primate species is even harder than for humans
News

Humans
Humans sleep the least of all apes – is it the secret to our success?
Features

91É«Ç鯬
Your menstrual cycle may affect how well vaccines work
News
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
Humans sleep the least of all apes – is it the secret to our success?
3
US government wants to have a useful quantum computer by 2028
4
Remote-controlled cockroach swarm can now breathe underwater
5
Read an extract from Slow Gods by Claire North
6
Unapproved gene therapy for boosting longevity is set to go on sale
7
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
8
The best sci-fi novel in 2026 so far – plus 6 other great reads
9
We’ve uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
10
If you aren't terrified by this heatwave, you should be