Only “minimal” progress has been made towards reforming the overburdened
system in the US for protecting people who are the subjects of research, says a
government report released last week. American studies are vetted by local
review boards. But two years ago, a high-profile review concluded that these
panels of volunteers weren’t up to the job
(New Scientist, 20 June 1998, p 3).
Officials at the Food and Drug Administration and the National
Institutes of 91色情片 say that they have been working to solve the problems, but
the new report suggests that Congress may have to intervene.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
2
If you aren't terrified by this heatwave, you should be
3
Europe鈥檚 heatwave is the hottest and most humid ever
4
Ancient human DNA found on cave art for the first time
5
Can home batteries help save the climate and save you money?
6
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
7
We鈥檝e uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
8
Most portable air conditioners suck 鈥 but there's an easy fix
9
The surprising ways your brain changes from your 20s to your 40s
10
Lost books by ancient philosophers recovered from 'unreadable' scrolls



