A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
The world's fastest spider tops 3.5 metres per second
2
The race to understand how and when Thwaites glacier will collapse
3
Babies are born with the neural foundations for maths
4
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
5
We’ve uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
6
This physicist is hunting for the biggest black hole in the universe
7
Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science
8
US government wants to have a useful quantum computer by 2028
9
I’m the first person whose life was saved by CRISPR base editing
10
Humans sleep the least of all apes – is it the secret to our success?



