Sociologist Steven Yearley takes a long look at the way in which ideas such
as “think globally, act locally” spring from a mistaken assumption that we all
mean the same thing when we discuss the world or global problems. In Sociology,
Environmentalism, Globalization (Sage, £12.95, ISBN 0 8039 7517 1), he
asserts that in capturing the moral high ground by claiming the planet for
themselves, environmentalists are ignoring the fragmented nature of many of the
problems they want to resolve. And the emotional construct that hangs round the
notion that we are all global now, united in defence of planet Earth, obscures
the real forces acting to damage the environment. Even the role of science as
arbiter of quarrels about pollution, for example, is questioned.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles
1
The world's fastest spider tops 3.5 metres per second
2
Babies are born with the neural foundations for maths
3
A type of fibre that stimulates GLP-1 release approved for use in food
4
The weirdness of neutrinos could completely rewrite particle physics
5
Slowdown of AMOC ocean current may be gradual and reversible
6
We’ve uncovered a master gene that switches on human development
7
Where, when and how to watch the 2026 solar eclipse
8
The best new science-fiction novels published in July 2026
9
This physicist is hunting for the biggest black hole in the universe
10
We’re not the most successful human species



