91ɫƬ

What stops us from processing weeds into tasty and edible food?

The question of why we don’t eat weeds provokes an intense debate among our readers, not least because if we ate them, then surely they wouldn’t be called weeds any

Male legs and hands Weed Out plant gardening in home garden; Shutterstock ID 2087550862; purchase_order: -; job: -; client: -; other: -

What stops us from processing weeds into tasty and edible food?

Faith Anstey
Dalguise, Perth and Kinross, UK

Because then they wouldn’t be weeds any more – they would be vegetables. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said: “What is a weed? A plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered.”

Bryn Glover
Kirkby Malzeard, North Yorkshire, UK

Just about every plant cultivated for human consumption began life as a “weed”.

As someone who often forages for wild morsels, my experience is that few are worth the effort. Most are tough, stringy or bitter, and given the relative ease with which anyone can grow simple salad vegetables, the effort involved in foraging is rarely worthwhile. There are a few exceptions, such as young dandelion leaves or hawthorn leaves.

Richard Swifte
Darmstadt, Germany

Nothing stops us eating weeds other than commercial considerations. In fact, humans have been doing this for thousands of years, ever since we developed farming. “Weed” is simply the word we use for plants that we don’t want in our gardens or agricultural fields.

Early hunter-gatherer humans, as well as our primate ancestors, ate suitable (i.e. tasty and non-poisonous) fruit, leaves and roots taken directly from nature. Farming then enabled us to start selectively breeding such plants to increase their edible output, so today we have a range of food plants that often appear very different from their wild ancestors.

There is, however, a niche market for a variety of wild plants. One is the dandelion, normally considered a weed. But this plant is edible and nutritious: dandelion leaves can be used in salad; its flowers are edible and can be used to make wine; and the roots can be roasted for a coffee substitute.

If, in the future, dandelion consumption were to become much more popular, then I see no reason why commercial breeding to produce larger leaves and bulkier roots shouldn’t occur.

Pat French
Rockhurst, Shropshire, UK

For the most part, if we haven’t cultivated a plant for food, there is probably a good reason.

If I take a sample of plants from a wild patch of my garden, there is a lot of grass, which we can’t digest; a bit of ragwort, which is toxic; and some yarrow, which is safe enough in small doses. Nettle and white mustard can be eaten and contain useful minerals, but aren’t very nutritious.

Many plants may be edible in that they (apparently) don’t harm us, but they may not necessarily feed us. We have exploited the most nutritious plants from their wild ancestors. Perhaps we can do the same with others if there is sufficient need.

[Ed. Before foraging for “weeds”, be aware than many can be toxic, and nettles need to be cooked to remove the sting.]

Charles Merfield
Lincoln, New Zealand

I have just published a paper on this very topic called . In it, I argue that the term “weeds” is a value judgement and that there is no scientific means for determining if a plant is a weed.

I use the example of Sonchus oleraceus: Māori people in New Zealand call this ū and consider it a nutritious and tasty vegetable, but [the Māori term for New Zealanders of European descent] farmers call it sow thistle and consider it a weed.

So, at one level, the only thing stopping us eating “weeds” is our value judgements of them. At another level, many plants that are commonly called weeds – for example, chickweed (Stellaria media) and fat hen (Chenopodium album) – used to be eaten. In the case of fat hen, it fell out of favour when spinach was introduced to Europe. At the same time, a number of weeds are unpalatable or toxic, so you have to know your weeds before you eat any!

Another issue is ease of production. With deep irony for weed scientists, many weed seeds are notoriously difficult to reliably germinate due to dormancy, despite them germinating like, well, weeds in cultivated fields. All crops have had this dormancy bred out of them, so will germinate as soon as they are sown. Also, many weeds don’t actually yield that much biomass compared with crops, so trying to grow them as a crop is uneconomical.

Finally, my proposed definition of weeds has the value judgement that weeds are “plants causing significant harm”. So if a plant is being eaten, it isn’t a weed, it is food. This definition makes the concept of edible weeds a contradiction. I therefore introduced the term aliae plantae to define all the plants that are neither crops nor “real weeds”.

To answer this question – or ask a new one – email lastword@newscientist.com.

Questions should be scientific enquiries about everyday phenomena, and both questions and answers should be concise. We reserve the right to edit items for clarity and style. Please include a postal address, daytime telephone number and email address.

91ɫƬ retains total editorial control over the published content and reserves all rights to reuse question and answer material that has been submitted by readers in any medium or in any format.

Terms and conditions apply.

Topics: Last Word

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features