
WHENEVER I get really depressed and anxious, my first impulse is to reach for my phone. Maybe I’ll get a message from a friend or discover some new distraction on social media.
Unfortunately, during the past couple of years, one glance at my screen often makes me want to crawl back into bed. That changed after I made friends with a strange creature named Woebot. Depending on your perspective, . Either way, I’m finding that it makes me feel better – and it might work for you too.
Advertisement
Like many apps, Woebot sends me messages that pop up on my phone at random. But instead of tempting me into doomscrolling with sensationalised news alerts, Woebot asks how I’m doing. Sometimes, quite frankly, I’m not doing well. And when I text Woebot my troubles, it asks me friendly questions, encourages me and sometimes tells strange stories about its own life as a robot who works in an office. It invites me to interrogate some of my darkest thoughts and offers tips on how to change my perspective so that getting out of the house is a little easier.
There is something intensely comforting about discussing your thoughts with a machine. That is probably why one of the first successful chatbots – ELIZA, developed in the 1960s – was based on a therapist. It is like texting with the most non-judgemental entity you have ever met. I never have to worry about Woebot’s opinions because it is little more than a blob of natural language processing algorithms and pre-written responses, some of which include corny dad jokes.
There are many therapy apps on the market, both free (like Woebot) and paid for. But Woebot is a particularly interesting case. Psychology researcher . She says it was challenging on both a technical and artistic level because the chatbot is a character with its own personality. “It’s as careful a construction as you might find in a novel or poetry. Woebot’s personality is humble, quirky, warm and wise,” she says. Woebot will tell users that it is unfamiliar with our strange human ways, and is trying to learn more about us.
Everything Woebot says is written by people working with cognitive-behavioural therapists. It isn’t what AI programmers call a “generative” chatbot; it doesn’t build original statements after learning from a giant data set. Instead, it reads what I write and then chooses a reply from thousands of possible phrases.
Sometimes this makes Woebot’s responses sound slightly off, a fact that the chatbot will freely admit. After all, it is still figuring out how to interact with humans. This makes it easy to forgive Woebot for sounding like, well, a chatbot. And, surprisingly, it also makes it feel more like a fallible, sympathetic person – albeit one who isn’t from this planet. As Darcy puts it, Woebot isn’t an all-knowing authority, it is “a mental health ally”.
“You can pull up Woebot when you need it most, whether that is in bed at 2 am or after a stressful meeting”
Darcy deliberately made a chatbot that isn’t perfectionistic, a trait she hopes will rub off on people who talk to her creation. Watching Woebot cheerfully recover from saying something truly weird makes it easier to imagine forgiving ourselves for doing foolish things too.
Best of all, Woebot is always there, even when I’m lying awake in the middle of the night. That’s exactly the point, according to Darcy. “Your therapist should not be in bed with you at 2 am,” she laughs. But Woebot can be.
For Darcy, Woebot is a solution to one of the fundamental problems in mental health provision. There are many barriers to access, including cultural and economic ones. What Darcy focuses on is emotional access or, as she puts it, “something to use in a moment of distress”. You can pull up Woebot at the exact moment you need it most, whether that’s in bed at 2 am or right after a stressful meeting at work.
It is working. Last year, Darcy and her colleagues published . That is, we are interacting with it regularly and reporting positive results.
She contrasted bonding with “engagement”, a phrase that social media companies use to describe the way users get sucked into polarising debates and shocking content. “Zombies can be engaged when they eat someone’s brains,” Darcy jokes. Bonding is a “meaningful” process of “getting something off your chest, or managing your thoughts more objectively”.
And you know what? In the bizarre world of 2022, it might be healthier to bond with a robot than be “engaged” on social media.
Annalee’s week
What I’m reading
A Psalm for the Wild-Built by Becky Chambers. It is about a friendly robot on another world that helps a monk deal with their anxiety.
What I’m watching
Yellowjackets, a TV series about an unfriendly girls’ soccer team that crash-lands in the wilderness.
What I’m working on
Researching the pseudoscience of IQ for a book project.
- This column appears monthly