鈥淭here is no energy here. It鈥檚 an empty shell鈥: Achim Steiner, head of the UN Environment Programme. 鈥淚 am disappointed in the process, and I am not alone鈥: Rachel Kyte, vice-president for sustainable development at the World Bank. 鈥淭here is a terrible lack of leadership鈥: Fabio Feldmann, veteran Brazilian environmentalist and personal representative of the Brazilian president.
The Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro this week is not looking promising. The conference will be devoid of the world leaders who attended its predecessor, 20 years ago. And there are no headline-grabbing treaties to sign. Its final declaration will not be binding to anyone. The main outcome will probably be to launch a set of 鈥渟ustainable development goals鈥 on issues like protecting forests, fisheries and water supplies.
Delegates here bemoan that most environmental indicators have gone in the wrong direction since the original Earth Summit, yet they are reaching for the same solutions.
Advertisement
In 1992, developing countries agreed commitments on protecting biodiversity and forests in return for promises of a 鈥済reen fund鈥 of development aid. They got about $5 billion.
This time, the Brazilian hosts are calling for a $30 billion 鈥済lobal fund for sustainable development鈥, and want the rich world to set aside its short-term economic concerns and cough up. 鈥淲e cannot be held hostage to financial crisis in rich countries,鈥 says Luiz Alberto Figueiredo, environment director at Brazil鈥檚 Ministry of External Affairs.
There is hope. The ostensible theme is 鈥済reen economics鈥. At fringe meetings all across this megacity, economists and natural scientists are discussing in detail how to put a dollar sign on the loss of natural capital like forests, minerals, water and fisheries, and to integrate these new measures into national and corporate accounting systems.
They are convinced that if governments and corporations included such measures in their accounting, alongside other indicators of the sustainability of their economies and businesses, leaders would take more care of nature.
In one such initiative, Steiner .
It found that while China鈥檚 economy has grown four-fold in the past two decades, its stock of natural capital has fallen by 17 per cent. Taking that into account, its 鈥渋nclusive wealth鈥 had only increased by 45 per cent.
