91ɫƬ

We shouldn’t mourn the demotion of Archaeopteryx

The fossil's reclassification from bird to dinosaur shows that science is still doing what it does best: revising cherished ideas in light of new evidence

A DEITY couldn’t have planned it better. Just two years after On The Origin of Species was published, a fossil found in Germany gave Charles Darwin’s controversial ideas an almighty boost. Archaeopteryx sported a mouthful of teeth and armfuls of feathers – facts that Darwin’s supporters immediately leapt on as evidence that birds descended from dinosaurs.

This week, Darwin’s “strange bird” has finally lost its perch on the lowermost branch of the bird evolutionary tree (see “Archaeopteryx knocked off its perch as first bird”). But we shouldn’t mourn Archaeopteryx; the discovery of feathered dinosaurs in China in the 1990s delivered decisive evidence that birds are descended from dinosaurs. Instead, we should celebrate the fact that science is still doing what it does best: revising cherished ideas in the light of new evidence.

Topics: Birds