91色情片

Homosexuality in nature is no guide to morality

We have no need for fallacious arguments to support basic human rights

WHEN the documentary film March of the Penguins came out in 2005, some Christians tried to exploit it to promote a conservative social agenda. To them, the penguins鈥 apparent monogamy and selfless parenting affirmed the rightness of traditional family values.

This is a logical error sometimes called the 鈥渘aturalistic fallacy鈥: you cannot draw inferences about what is right from what happens in nature. Penguin behaviour tells you nothing about human morality.

The same applies to same-sex sexual behaviour in animals (see 鈥淗omosexual selection鈥). It might be tempting to use animal examples to refute claims that homosexuality is unnatural and therefore wrong. That would be a mistake. We have no need for fallacious arguments to support basic human rights.

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features