91ɫƬ

New UK nuclear plants could prove costly

Much of the bill to replace the country's 12 ageing nuclear plants may have to come out of the public purse, and cost three times industry predictions

MORE bad news this week for those in the UK hoping that nuclear power will help keep global warming in check. Much of the cost of replacing the country’s 12 ageing nuclear power stations will have to come out of the public purse. What’s more, the energy from new reactors will cost almost three times industry predictions.

So say two independent reports released this week – one from Oxera, an economics consultancy group in Oxford, and another from the New Economics Foundation (NEF), a London-based think tank.

Oxera says that meagre returns on the estimated £8.6 billion needed to replace the UK’s nuclear power stations will deter the industry from investing in nuclear energy. So the taxpayer will have to fund new reactors. And the NEF says that once realistic construction and running costs are factored in, the price of electricity rises from an estimated 3 pence per kilowatt-hour to 8.3 pence per kilowatt-hour. And that does not include the cost of managing pollution, insuring the nuclear power stations or protecting them from terrorists.

The reports come shortly before the G8 summit in Scotland next week, at which nuclear power is on the agenda. NEF’s policy director Andrew Simms says that the answer to global warming is renewable technologies. “In an international context [nuclear power] is a no-brainer,” he says.