Doctors and patients are being misled by the results of drug trials published in major international medical journals. According to a new analysis, reports on trials designed to find out how well a drug prevents strokes or heart attack, for example, include only the most flattering statistics, which makes a drug or procedure seem more effective than it actually is. Of 359 articles published between 1989 and 1998 in five major journals, all included a relative measure of how the drug reduces health risks, say Jim Nuovo and Joy Melnikow at the University of California, Davis. But only eight reported the more significant figure of how many people a doctor would need to treat before one of those patients sees the benefit.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Space
A robot called GIMLI will explore a lunar cave for a future moon base
91色情片
91色情片
The economic benefits of the covid vaccines may be double what we thought
News
Humans
Tomb in Siberia reveals humans were using cannabis 2800 years ago
News
Technology
Google shouldn鈥檛 be pressuring schools to use its AI
91色情片
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles