A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from New Scientist
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Life
A baby echidna has been born in a university for the first time
News
Physics
Einstein thought time dilation was both real and not – he was right
91ɫƬ
Space
Read an extract from Chanda Prescod-Weinstein’s The Edge of Space-Time
Culture
91ɫƬ
‘Thinking about the edges of space-time can help build a better world’
Culture
Popular articles
Trending New Scientist articles